|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nutrient concentrations, nutrient ratios and nutrient limitationsAccording to the definition of eutrophication, eutrophication is caused by enrichment of the water by inorganic nutrients. In the Baltic water entering the Danish straits both winter nitrate and phosphate concentrations have about doubled from 1970 to the mid 1980s (Nausch et al. 1999). The same is the case for water entering from the German Bight to Danish North Sea waters with the Jutland Coastal Current (Hickel et al. 1995). In the Kattegat surface water the winter nitrate and phosphate concentrations have increased about 40% in the period 1971–1990 (Andersson 1996). NUTRIENT CONCENTRATIONS
The water in the Danish North Sea is essentially a mixture of two water masses: freshwater from the rivers to the southern North Sea and German Bight with high nutrient concentrations, and central North Sea water with high salinity (34–34.5) and low in nutrients. Therefore, the winter nutrient concentrations generally show an inverse linear correlation to the salinity (Figures 2.13). Likewise, the water in the Kattegat and Belt Sea essentially is a mixture of Baltic Sea surface water with low salinity (~8) and nutrient concentrations, and Skagerrak water with high salinity (34–35) and higher nutrient concentrations. However, the winter nutrient concentrations in the Kattegat and Belt Sea show a positive deviation from a linear relationship in the salinity interval 10–25, due to local supplies of nutrients in the Belt Sea and Kattegat. Freshwater runoff is too small compared to the Baltic outflow to influence the salinity significantly in the Belt Sea and Kattegat. In Skagerrak many different water masses and mixtures between them may be present: Jutland Coastal Current water from the German Bight (salinity 30–33), central North Sea water, North Atlantic water (salinity ~35), Kattegat surface water and locally influenced coastal waters (Figures 2.13). The water in the estuaries is generally a mixture between local freshwater runoff and coastal seawater from outside the estuary. For assessing the development of nutrient concentrations in Danish waters indices for mean annual concentrations of DIN, TN, DIP and TP in the upper mixed layer were developed for estuaries-coastal waters and the open Kattegat–Belt Sea, respectively (see box 4). The indices for DIN and TN generally fluctuated around a constant level during the period 1989–2001, in both the estuaries–coastal waters and the open Kattegat-Belt Sea (except for a weak decreasing tendency for DIN in open waters). However, low concentrations were observed in the very dry years 1996 and 1997, when the land-based nitrogen load was about half of normal. The indices for DIP and TP decreased significantly in the estuaries–coastal waters, but was less pronounced in the open Kattegat–Belt Sea through the period 1989-2001 (Figures 2.14). Freshwater runoff is the most important factor affecting nutrient concentrations in Danish waters. In estuaries and coastal waters the correlations between the indices for annual mean DIN and TN concentrations and runoff were highly significant for the period 1989–97 (Figure 2.15). The years 1998–2001 deviate from this, as the DIN and TN concentrations in Danish streams decreased during this period (Bøgestrand 2001). Likewise, significant correlations were found for DIP and TP in estuaries and coastal waters for the period 1992–1997. The years 1989–1991 were omitted as significant reductions in the phosphorus point source load took place in these years. In the open Kattegat–Belt Sea significant correlations were also found for DIN and TN, but not for DIP and TP. However, all the annual mean nutrient indices were corrected for runoff variations according to the correlations observed. In the estuaries and coastal waters the DIN and TN indices normalised to mean runoff show a significant decrease in the later years 1998–2001, and the normalised DIP and TP indices have reached a constant low level in the same years. In the open Kattegat–Belt Sea the normalised indices for DIN, DIP and TP show a slow decrease over the whole period 1989–2001 (Figures 2.14). NUTRIENT RATIOS In the open Belt Sea and Kattegat the N/P-ratio based on winter DIN and DIP concentrations is generally between 10 and 20 and thus does not deviate much from the Redfield ratio. In the North Sea the N/P-ratio is generally high ranging between 25 and 60, except in the saline central North Sea. In the Skagerrak N/P-ratios are also high at salinities lower than 33 (Figures 2.13 and 2.16). Generally the winter N/P-ratio in estuaries is high (>25) to very high (>100) (Figure 2.16). N/P-ratios based on annual mean DIN and DIP indices in the estuaries-coastal waters show an increase from 1989 to 1998 parallel to the reduction in phosphorus load, and then a decrease to 2001 parallel to the decrease in nitrogen load per unit runoff. In the very dry years of 1996-97 with low nitrogen load the uncorrected N/P-ratio indices were much lower than in neighbouring years (Figures 2.14). In the open Kattegat-Belt Sea no general development is observed in the annual DIN:DIP indices during the period 1989–2001.
NUTRIENT LIMITATIONS In estuaries phytoplankton primary production is often potentially limited by low phosphate concentrations early in the productive season. In 2000 potential phosphate limitation in 6 estuaries extended from about 1 month in Horsens Fjord and Odense Fjord to 3 months in Skive Fjord and Limfjorden and up to 6 months in Ringkøbing Fjord. While no potential phosphate limitation was observed in Roskilde Fjord. Potential co-limitation by low concentrations of both DIN and phosphate was most pronounced in Horsens Fjord for a period of about 2 months. The estuaries, except Ringkøbing Fjord, were potentially nitrogen limited in late summer for one to two months (Figure 2.17A) (Henriksen et al. 2001). The number of days with potential phosphate limitation has increased significantly in the estuaries since the early 1990s parallel to the decrease in phosphorus load from land (Figures 2.17).
Both nutrient concentrations and nutrient ratios suggest that DIN continues to be the nutrient potentially most limiting to phytoplankton biomass in the Kattegat and Belt Sea (Figure 2.17B). Phytoplankton were mostly potentially co-limited by DIN and DIP concentrations or limited by DIN concentrations (Ærtebjerg et al., 1998). Redfield ratios suggest that when phytoplankton were co-limited by DIN and DIP, that DIN is most often the most potentially limiting nutrient. Although phosphate was potentially limiting by itself only for limited periods each year, the periods that the open sea areas are co-limited by low concentrations of DIN and DIP has significantly increased with time (Figure 2.18). Dissolved silicate concentrations are occasionally low enough (<2 µM) to limit diatom populations.
CONCLUSION
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Danish Environmental Protection Agency & National Environmental Research Institute • updated: |